Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen is offering no assurances that are false his state’s appropriate right to authorize a ‘satellite casino’ 13 miles from the MGM Springfield in Massachusetts.
The legal issues surrounding the proposal are complex and uncertain, he said in a letter to Governor Dannel Malloy.
Connecticut AG George Jepsen is uncertain that a casino project created to blunt competition through the MGM Springfield could endure future constitutional legal challenges.
MGM Resorts has attempted to sue Connecticut over the enactment of its ‘Special Act 15-7,’ which established the method that allowed hawaii’s two tribal gaming operators to seek a bunch municipality for the border casino that is proposed.
Since this is a commercial casino situated outside tribal lands, the MGM lawsuit claimed the the Special Act was in violation of equal protection guarantees and the commerce clause, enshrined in the US Constitution.
Basically, had Connecticut really wanted to determine a commercial casino it needs to have opened the method up to all commercial operators and not simply its two federally recognized tribes, the Mohegans and the Mashantucket Pequots.
Connecticut has made small secret associated with fact the primary purpose of the casino could be to deflect competition through the MGM Springfield to counteract the effect that is detrimental would have by itself casino industry.